1.2 Defining OER
You have just watched Clint talking about creating a free textbook for students at BCcampus, how the authors didn't necessarily write every single component of the book but used images and animations that already existed online. He refers to this textbook as an open educational resource, an OER. In as much as it is meant for teaching and learning, we understand the textbook is 'educational', but 'open'? What do you think makes Clint's textbook an open resource? Is it the fact that it is free? Is it because the authors reused the work of others? The following video explains in more detail what open educational resources are.
Open Education Matters: Why is it important to share content?
We can say then that what makes a resource open is the manner in which we interact with it, what we can do with it. In this sense, it was David Wiley who came up with the idea that for a resource to be open, one would have the freedom to:
- Reuse - Use the content in a variety of ways
- Revise - Adapt, adjust, modify, improve, or alter the content (e.g., translate the content into another language)
- Remix - Combine the original or revised content with other OER to create something new (e.g., incorporate the content into a mashup)
- Redistribute - Share copies of the original content, your revisions, or your remixes with others (e.g., post a copy of the content online for others to download)
- Retain - Make, own, and control copies of the content
Source: The 5R Permissions of OER. Lumen Learning.
Think about your own work: Which of these Rs do you already do? Do you have any experience/examples that you would like to share? Post a comment in the forum below and reply to at least one entry from another course participant.