I read the article “What Levels of Guidance Promote Engaged Exploration with Interactive Simulations?” It is very interesting to see that “no guidance” is preferable to traditional “cookbook instructions.” In fact, I wonder how often our traditional teaching methods actually interfere with learning instead of promoting exploration and innovation.
In the “demonstration of alignment for the isotope activity,” I like the idea of having students work with a partner to write quiz questions since students who ask have a vested interest in searching for answers. It could also be interesting to have students list the questions a journalist might ask while using the simulation. I am searching for ways to draw out essential questions from students as they work (and play!) Any ideas are welcome.
I thoroughly appreciate the resources and posts available to date on this P2PU course.
Second Homework - Explore Ideas about using PhET
Please select one or two of these options:
1. Explore Guided Inquiry Strategies for PhET use and test your understanding using the Guideline Practice
a) Read PhET guide for Inquiry Activities
b) Review Demonstration of alignment for isotope activity
c) Try Guideline Practice pH Scale
2.Want more ideas about how teachers use PhET? Read one of these and submit a reflection.
a) Check out Trish’s Sugar and Salt Activity
3. Interested in PhET research? Read an article and submit a reflection.
a) Teaching physics using PhET simulations
b) Factors promoting engaged exploration with computer simulations
c) What Levels of Guidance Promote Engaged Exploration with Interactive Simulations?